Thursday, 3 January 2013

HEAT


                                                                             Heat


   I recently have watched a movie called “Heat”. It was a very action packed, thrilling, and high speed.

   The main thing that I noticed in this movie was the usage of stunts, and camera angles. In this movie, there were a lot of chasing scenes. This is because it was a gangster themed story with lots of city life and action. I think that they had to make the angles and ideas for different angles very creative.

  Action movies are not what I usually enjoy but the director had a way of keeping my attention through out the whole movie with out being bored. I think the parts that really kept my attention were the fighting or chasing scenes. I found them very interesting because there was so much going on, and there was so much to look at.

  The suspense in this movie was what also made it very high quality. I find the more suspense; the more you have to think. That is all due to the director’s ideas.

  The main actors in this movie really played their characters well, and were able to convince the audience that they really were professional gangsters/crooks. They made you believe this, because they put a lot of emotion and power into the lines that they were speaking. You could just tell that all of them knew exactly what they were doing.

This movie really captured my attention, and I would like to watch it again.

Saturday, 8 December 2012

45 MINUTES OUT OF THE MOVIE “KINGDOM OF HEAVEN”


45 MINUTES OUT OF THE MOVIE “KINGDOM OF HEAVEN”

1:44-3.33
Because I feel like the part where the knights are cutting off Balian’s wife’s head, and burring her, doesn’t add much at all to the story. Through out the movie Kingdom of heaven, I found the story about his wife to be un- important except for when he kills the man in the black smith store that is wearing his wife’s necklace and visits him at work.  1.89

           
12:13-12:45
I think that the director doesn’t need to state how much of a fighter Balain is, because through out the movie, he definitely proves him self worthy of being a brave knight. This fight seen at the camp just adds on more to his character but I think it’s unnecessary. 32

23:11-24:08
 This scene doesn’t really add up to the movie. I don’t think it’s very important for Balain to have this conversation in the town with one of the potential kings. 1 37

27:31-29:41
 I think they could have cut out the shipwreck to Jerusalem, because it doesn’t add up to the movie. I found this part to be very confusing. In the next scene, Balain is traveling in the desert, so I think that people would just suspect that he already took some kind of transportation and now is walking to find it. 2 10

34:56-35:25
 Him walking along isn’t very important to the movie. 109

38:01-38:38
 when Balain was caring for the horse, I found it to be a bit boring because it didn’t add anything to the movie in my opinion. 37




41:39-42:27
This isn’t important to the film, because this character ends up being killed in the end, and I don’t think the director
should waste the movies valuable time elaborating on him, or this conversation. 128

44.55-46.02
I think that this isn’t that important to the story because the queen and Balain talk right after so it would seem as if dinner would finish then they have their conversation. 147


48.00-49.15
During this part, I feel like it is a bit of the king just rambling on, and it doesn’t really make that much sense near the end of his talk. I think the director should have just stopped the conversation there.
115
49:20-51.08
This part doesn’t need to be in the film, because it makes more sense when it just cuts to the next scene and goes from there. You don’t miss anything by taking it out. 188

53.10-54.35
 In this scene it is elaborating on how the queen and Balain like each other, but I think it’s un-important, because they already established this in the beginning. 125

55.28-56.24
To me, this is just almost footage that Riddley Scott put in to make the movie longer and more developed, but I think the movie would still be fine with out the conversation between the queen and Balain. 96

58.12-101.39
The fight scene is short and not very important so I think that they should have taken it out, and just started a new scene when the king said, “assemble the army”. 5min

102.24-103.40
I don’t really understand why this fight scene is in the movie because I feel like it doesn’t do anything to enhance the plot. I still feel like the director is just adding in more, and more fighting scenes to elongate the film. I do not think that this is a good idea.116

105.36-106.07
When the knights are running towards each other to fight, the running seems to last for forever, so I think by cutting it down it will capture people’s attention much longer. 71

109.37-110.30
This traveling scene takes too long and makes the viewers loose attention on the film. 93

112.03-113.55
This part of the movie really confuses me, because the man gets beaten by the king, for yelling remarks in the town. I just don’t see how this helps and characters or the plot. That is why I took it out.152

115.00-116.50
The talk between the two men is confusing, and again its just a way that the director is trying to make the movie more developed and longer.1.5

125.20-128.27
 This part of the movie involves another pointless fighting scene and I think that the director could have used these 3 or so minutes to elaborate more on the main character Balian’s life. I don’t like how he did this scene either because I feel like some of the camera angles are off.  307

130.19-132.40
I feel like they don’t have to have a talk before they go to war. I think they should have just gone straight to battle and not wasted any viewing time. 2.21

133.36-140.19

This part of the movie really confuses me, and I don’t think that it’s necessary to have it in. I like the idea of having to wait until the very end to have a giant fight scene rather than having so many in the middle that aren’t important for the story.  6.83


146.36-147.23
The scene is lasting to long when they are at battle so I think it should be cut down just by a couple of minutes. 87

150.47-152.48
There is too much of a battle scene, and I think that they could have taken out a couple of minutes of it just to make it a bit shorter. 201


155.13-156.22

I think that the battle scene again is way too long because after this point, its just getting repetitive and un interesting. 109




202.00-203.00

the scene is again lasting way too long and the camera angles were the only parts that were changing in this part of the movie. 100

209.35-211.05

This particular part isn’t very important to the scene, and they should have taken it out so that they could’ve gotten on with showing the town of Jerusalem being converted. 1.7




Cinematic points of view on the film Stand By Me


          Cinematic points of view on the film Stand By Me.


  When watching the film stand by me, I realized many aspects of cinema through out the film. The points I would like to talk about are the following; the use of camera angles, costumes, lighting, and special effects.


  I noticed a lot of good use in the camera angle opportunities in this film. I found that when there was a switch to a different scene, they would choose an angle that could really make you feel like you were in the movie. At times, they would put the camera in front of the characters as they were walking along the train tracks and I thought that was a good choice for the director. I think that when they added that touch, you could really see the whole scene and everything that was going on. At other times, Robert Reiner (the director) would take the chance to do a scene from the characters point of view. This was very interesting to me, because I did feel like I was on the train tracks looking for Ray Brower along with them. This movie was defiantly about an adventure, and if you were not deeply engaged with it, you would get bored very easily because it would seem as just a movie where boys are walking along rail -road tracks looking for a body they may or may not discover.  In reality, them walking along is the whole movie. This is why camera angles were so important to make you feel like you were there.



   The costumes in this movie I thought were high budget and prominent. I think that Robert Reiner did a phenomenal job on suiting the characters to their clothes. As soon as a new character walked in the frame, I could tell what kind of person they would turn out to be, just by looking at what they were wearing. For example, Robert Reiner could spend a lot on the original costumes of the group of boys. He could do this because they really only had to wear one outfit for majority of the film. If I had read the book before I saw the movie, I would have pictured the boys in the same outfits as they were wearing in the movie.



 I noticed that the director used a lot of lighting techniques that caught my eye. I am going to talk about one scene in particular for this theory. In the scene where they were having an overnight camp -fire, each boy had to stay awake and guard the site. When each one was hiding behind the tree on the look out, they had one side of their face lit up, and the other was in shadows.  I thought that this symbolized one side of the boys being scared (the shadowed side). The shadowed side also showed that a lot of them do have a dark side to their personalities. The other side of their faces was lit up. The first thing that came to mind when I noticed this was, they were very vulnerable at the moment they were guarding. I really thought that this scene added a great amount of description about each boy’s personality to the film Stand By Me.

  The use of special effects was striking during the action scenes, such as running away from the train. When I was watching it, I was thinking about how hard it would be to get a train and chase the boys at perfect timing. I’m not sure if green screens were around at this time, but even if they were this part of the movie was impressing. I thought that getting the camera around at the right times to capture every second of exhilarating action was incredible. Other parts in the movie that used great special effects were every time a gun fired. The crew would have to make an explosion every time that a gun was fired, and it would have to be at the right time, every time. I think the film could have used a bit more action, or suspense, but each time that they did, I thought it was ample.

   


 


Monday, 19 November 2012

The Count Of Monte Cristo


                The Count Of Monte Cristo


    Personally, I did not enjoy either of the versions of this movie. I thought that it was very boring, confusing, and unstructured. Most people enjoyed this movie, but I just found it very hard to follow along and understand what was going on

    I must say though, that I thought the 1934 movie was very impressive. The movie graphics were what impressed me the most, because it was very original. They used very interesting ideas for the time that it was filmed. The plot though, was very hard to follow and they could have developed the ideas a lot more.

   The only part in the 1934 movie I found interesting was, the part where the two main characters were in the jail trying to escape. This was the only part of the movie I could pay attention to.

    Over all I liked the 2002 version much better. I found it to be more defined and detailed compared to the older version. This of course, is bound to happen, because the movies are made in two completely different time periods, but I think the second was better.

I would not watch this movie again, because in my opinion, was one of the worst movies I have seen yet. 

Sunday, 11 November 2012

Literary, Dramatic, and Cinematic points of view on the film “Gone With The Wind”


                    

 Literary, Dramatic, and Cinematic points of view on the film “Gone With The Wind”


    Through out the film “Gone With The Wind”, I noticed many reflections and many factors that proved the film involved all three of these topics. It was made in the year of 1939, and was produced by David O. Selznick. Victor Fleming, who is a well known, and very skilled director, directed the movie. He completed many moves such as “The Wizard Of Oz” and of course “Gone With The Wind”. Gone With The Wind won ten Academy Awards, and held this record for twenty years. It was also ranked in at number four on the top one hundred best American Films Of All Time in 1998. The movie has had the best turn out, and earned the most money in history.

     I will start discussing the literary category. This movie was much like a book, because the story plot was very fascinating and the plot seemed like it truly did belong in a classic storybook. Constantly through the movie, I kept thinking that the movie would be better left just as a story.

    I think the main topic that made me think this way was the dialogue. This movie was an old English type, because it was filmed in 1939, and had quite a lot of literary terms and language used by many classic novels. The sentence structure was very profound and interesting. Each character pronounced the words with such passion and emotion, that I thought it may certainly be straight out of a novel.

  What made me think that it was also a novel was the length of the film. Usually you cannot finish a book in an hour and a half, so that is why this movie was extended and prolonged. Ninety-five percent of movies today do not have intermissions. This movie however, does. I personally thought that this was a good idea because audiences would have time to let the moods and thoughts sink in. This is also very comparable to a movie, because every time you read a book, you generally would stop and take breaks. This would also do the same thing by letting all of the feelings and moods sink in. I thought that this point was a clear indicator of Gone With The Wind being similar to a book. 


    Another similarity that this movie has with novels is the time that it was made in. (1939) because around this period of time, majority of the population only had books for entertainment. People would be expecting a plot, dialogue and a resolution just like they would be used to if they were to read a story. The director (Victor Fleming) would have to work very hard at adding in details and structure to make sure that the film would be what the audience was already used to in novels already.


   I also really noticed the plot structure in this movie. It somewhat reminded me of an anti climatic, complicated, twisted story. There is the occasional book, which fits into this category to relate to literary points with the film. This movie was not like your typical film. It really had not genre and didn’t represent any stories that were previously made. Books are the same way also. Each book can be so different, and have very unique plot structures and endings just like the film Gone With The Wind.

   The way that Scarlett O’Hara was chasing after Ashley Wilkes, who was head over heals for Melanie Hamilton reminded me of a classic love story. It reminded me of Romeo and Juliet in a way, because, it was the kind of love story that was twisted and different than what we are used to learning about. This was another key point that leads me to believe this movie had a lot of relations with novels.

   For the dramatic aspects on “Gone With The Wind”, I have a lot more to say. I noticed that this movie had more similarities and references to the drama department. From the costumes, to the lighting I noticed so much.



   The costumes in this play reminded me of something I would see on the stage of an old English play.  Each costume was perfected down to the tee. We even were previously discussing how the actors and actresses costumes were so perfected; that even the underwear was from the old days to get them thinking about what it was really like back then. They spent very high amounts of money trying to make the costumes perfect. Each lady had to wear a very large old-style 1861 styled dress. Each dress was thousands of dollars and took forever to custom make. This would have been very expensive and time consuming for the crew. This is the same idea with drama productions because, many times, the stage rentals, costumes, actors, and lights cost a lot. Each actor ad actress would have to go through hair and makeup, just as live drama productions would have to do.


   Another point I can think of, are the sets. Each set was very high quality for the time period that the movie was made in. If you took the time to realize the detail painted into each scene, it was immense.  Some scenes I have to admit were a little bit off with the lighting, or how the set colors were used. That was something I could relate to in live drama, because if something on stage goes wrong, the show still must go on. I found that the movie was very well cut in between scenes. In live theater, they do this by shutting of the lights, setting the mood with music, and changing to a different scene. In Gone With The Wind, they use the cut and paste method with the actual film. I still find this similar because in both situations they are changing the mood, and accustoming you to a different part of the story line.


   During most scenes, the characters had to react on the spot to different situations that were presented. Sometimes, in Gone With The Wind, they overreacted. In most cases I wouldn’t normally encourage if an actress or actor over reacted but I feel as though it helped build drama in the story. I also see this with actors on stage quite frequently. This movie, and live theater both benefited from this gesture, because I know I felt more on the edge of my seat while watching the problem, or scene un fold.


   The cinematic points on this film, were very tough for me to think about, because I didn’t noticed that many in every scene that were relevant to today’s movies. Any time I thought about how this could relate to today’s movies my thoughts changed because this movie was made around the time when movies were first starting come out, and it was one of a kind.

    I am going to talk about one particular scene in the movie where I noticed them using innovating and unique camera angles. There was a scene in the movie where Scarlet and Melanie were in a church praying. They were leaning down, and there was a light candle flickering in front of their faces. Typically, you could not get this type of shot with a camera and have the shadows projected on the wall like the director envisioned. To make his vision come true, they previously filmed the shadows and projected them onto the wall. Then the two actresses were being filmed at real time to match their shadows on the church wall that were previously recorded. You could tell that the shadows were not actually matching the actresses because their movements were slightly off.

  This movie was one of a kind, and I thought it was very interesting how they could make a 238 minute-long movie with really no true genre. They captured and paved a way for all movies afterwards to follow what they had done. They mixed adventure and romance, comedy, drama, action and much more to make this fascinating movie.

  Vivien Leigh  (Scarlett O’Hara) really did make the movie cinematically. She added just the right touch of emotion to everything that she did. I know that it took the directors a long time to cast the character of Scarlett, and I think they waited just for the right person, and it paid off. She was a very important character because without the right person to play Scarlett, this movie would have fallen to its knees.


   The camera angles in this movie, I believe set a standard. This was one of the first movies to be this long, and one of the first to use innovating camera angles, and shots. They used some from a bird’s eye view, and even tried some shots that were in the actor or actresses perspective. Movies afterwards used Gone With The Wind’s camera techniques to better their movie. I believe that they set an example o how all movies since 1939 had to be made.


   Gone With The Wind had you feeling almost every emotion that you could feel. One minute you could feel sad, and the happy the next. This was all to do with the director and how he played a very prominent role in this movie. Personally, I think that this is what led all the directors now days to do the same. We think of directors now as the people that manage and control everything that happen in their movie. Gone With The Wind certainly set the standards very high with how much Victor Fleming was involved. He had envisioned specific details and morals that the movie should follow. This is why I think the movie won so many Academy Awards.


   The movie Gone With The Wind could never be any better, and was definitely the best of its kind. I believe that every person should have a chance to discover what a truly wonderful movie should be like. The actors, actresses, crew, technicians and director deserve everything that they have won for this mesmerizing film. I am very glad I got to watch this classic movie, and share my thoughts and opinions on Gone With The Wind. 

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Night Of The Living Dead

                                                        Night Of The Living dead.


               I thought that this movie was very boring and had no real plot line. It was directed by George A. Romero, and I donn't think he did a very good job, because during the movie I started to loose focus. I thought that the way they made the zombies was very well done condidering it was the first zombie movie ever made The costumes are also very realistic and that is one thing I think the director did well.

        I didn't like this movie though, because i found it to be un-entertaining and unstructured. The whole film took place in an old house that had nothing but a radio. When something important happened on the radio, i found they kept playing the same news over and over again, and it made the movie seem un-professional.


    The characters in the movie weren't very smart. Barbra, who i thought would be the main character, was very usless amd didn't do anything in this movie. When they added scenes
with her into the movie, I thought it was a waste of film.


   During the movie, I found that the characters were not very smart, and didn't really do much in the given situation. This was the first movie of the zombie genre, so the zombie creatures were not well developed. If i were to make a new genre like the one George A. Romero did, i would have tried to keep the zombies personalities consistant. I say this because at the begining of the movie, the zombies were not very smart, and they walked slowly. As the movie went on, they got increasingly fast and i didnt think this was very realistic.



     Over all, I will say that i would never watch this movie again because it just wasnt my style, and didn't fit my liking.



Thursday, 18 October 2012

Literary Aspects On "The Goonies"


                The Literary Aspects On "The Goonies”


   I chose to write about the literary points, and examples for the 1985 film “The Goonies”. I chose this category, because I found that there aren’t a substantial amount of films about pirates today, they are usually in books and novels.

  I know that there are movies that are about pirates, but this movie specifically is different than all the others. I think that the plot is quite different and very unique. They didn’t use the pirates as the main characters, in this movie all the pirates are dead, but they are still very involved in the story line. The adventure that they went on was very intriguing and it kept me glued to the screen.

   The story line was very similar to those of novels. I think that having the story of a group of outcasts going to find hidden treasure, because of a map they found was very novel like. This was and adventure movie and it had a lot of suspense and aspects about being brave in tough situations. I found that in books they usually show a lot of bravery. I thought that this movie was very prominent in doing so.

  This movie seems like it would also work very well, if not better as a book. I think that it would because, pirates remind me of a storybook theme. When the Goonies find the monster, and the underground world, it seems like its all a fictional story for a novel. The “monster” that was living in the house just doesn’t seem like a movie character to me. He seems more like he would be placed in a novel. I really liked this character though because I thought he added a different side to the film.


  This movie also used a lot of interesting langue (Spanish) which I though fit into the literary category. Spanish is a language that the pirates spoke.I thought that this was another good example of how words were written down and passes on by different cultures.


   This was a very good movie to write about literary comparisons from my point of view.